Difference between revisions of "List of Alloys for Corrosion Rates"

From wiki.olisystems.com
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 415: Line 415:
 
'''Notes:'''<br>
 
'''Notes:'''<br>
 
Note 1 = Alloy 625 can contain up to 3 weight percent Niobium which alters the mechanism for thermal aging.  Thus the thermal aging calculation is not available for this alloy. <br>
 
Note 1 = Alloy 625 can contain up to 3 weight percent Niobium which alters the mechanism for thermal aging.  Thus the thermal aging calculation is not available for this alloy. <br>
Note 2 = the composition for this alloy does not enter into the corrosion rate calculations in the OLI software. The compositions listed are maximum values for each component and may or may not sum to 100 %. They are included here as a guide.<br>
+
Note 2 = the composition for this alloy does not enter into the corrosion rate calculations in the OLI software. The compositions listed are maximum values for each component and may or may not sum to 100 %. They are included here as a guide. The following references were used to compile the data for alloys designated as Note 2<br>
 +
 
 +
*[[media:Carbon-Steel-Handbook.pdf | Carbon Steels (PDF, 2.7 mb)]]
 +
*[[media:Copper NickelAlloys PropertiesandApplications 12007 .pdf |Copper-Nickel Alloys (PDF, 0.8 mb)]]
 +
*[[media:Inconel-alloy-625.pdf |Alloy 625 (PDF, 1.0 mb)]]
  
  

Revision as of 07:18, 3 December 2015

Here is a list of alloys that are currently available for corrosion rate calculations. Also listed is whether or not the alloy is suitable for the thermal aging calculations.
All compositions are in weight percent.

Alloy Name Fe Ni Cr Mo C N Al Cu Mn Si Zn S P Thermal Aging Notes
13 %Cr stainless steel 86.85 0 13 0 0.15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Yes
Alloy 2205 68.612 5.5 22.5 3.2 0.018 0.17 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Yes
Alloy 254SMO 55.68 18 20 6.1 0.02 0.2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Yes
Alloy 600 8.534 75.032 16.408 0 0.026 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Yes
Alloy 625 5 58 23 10 0.1 0 0.4 0 0.5 0.5 0 0.015 0.015 No Note 1
Alloy 690 9.35 62.056 28.57 0 0.024 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Yes
Alloy 825 30.41 44.28 22.09 3.21 0.01 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Yes
Alloy C-22 3.8 58.196 21.4 16.6 0.004 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Yes
Alloy C-276 5.544 60.372 16.133 17.948 0.003 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Yes
Aluminum 1100 0.95 0 0 0 0 0 99 0.05 0.05 0.95 0.1 0 0 No Note 2
Aluminum 1199 (Pure) 0.006 0 0 0 0 0 99.99 0.006 0.002 0.006 0.006 0 0 No Note 2
Carbon steel 1018 98.8 0 0 0 0.2 0 0 0 0.9 0 0 0.05 0.05 No Note 2
Carbon steel A212B 98.01 0 0 0 0.35 0 0 0 0.9 0.3 0 0.04 0.4 No Note 2
Carbon steel A216 96.515 0.5 0.5 0.2 0.3 0 0 0.3 1 0.6 0 0.045 0.04 No Note 2
Carbon steel G10100 (generic) 99.18 0 0 0 0.13 0 0 0 0.6 0 0 0.05 0.04 No Note 2
Cu 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 100 0 0 0 0 0 No Note 2
CuNi 7030 0 30 0 0 0 0 0 70 0 0 0 0 0 No Note 2
CuNi 9010 0 10 0 0 0 0 0 90 0 0 0 0 0 No Note 2
Fe (Pure) 100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 No Note 2
Fe (Zone Refined) 100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 No Note 2
Ni 0 100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 No Note 2
Stainless Steel 304 71.93 9 19 0 0.07 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Yes
Stainless Steel 316 69.466 10.91 17.4 2.17 0.054 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Yes

Notes:
Note 1 = Alloy 625 can contain up to 3 weight percent Niobium which alters the mechanism for thermal aging. Thus the thermal aging calculation is not available for this alloy.
Note 2 = the composition for this alloy does not enter into the corrosion rate calculations in the OLI software. The compositions listed are maximum values for each component and may or may not sum to 100 %. They are included here as a guide. The following references were used to compile the data for alloys designated as Note 2


Author: Jim Berthold